Published Friday, September 6, 2013 at 1:00 am / Updated at 5:05 pm
shortened prison sentences
World-Herald editorial: Good time, bad behavior

Why call it “good time”? How about “half the time”? Because a Nebraska prison sentence generally means only half of what it says.

The case of carjacker and prison bruiser Nikko Jenkins, who now is accused in four killings that took place only weeks after his prison release, calls out for Nebraska legislators to re-examine the 1992 state law that automatically halves the prison terms of most state inmates.

And it shows how difficult this law and subsequent changes have made it for inmates to lose much “good time,” no matter how badly they behave while in prison.

The legislative bill that brought about those changes was LB 816, sponsored by Sen. Ernie Chambers of Omaha and supported by Sen. Brad Ashford of Omaha, who now chairs the Legislature’s Judiciary Committee.

Ashford said Thursday that the intent of the 1992 bill, which passed 27-6, was to address inconsistent sentencing by judges and to put into law the use of carrots and sticks to help motivate inmates. It was not meant to be lenient on violent criminals, Ashford said.

Before the 1992 legislation, state law said inmates could earn shortened criminal sentences when they demonstrated good behavior — a sensible approach. But during debate on LB 816, lawmakers removed the words “for good behavior.” That ill-considered change effectively cut sentences in half, without the specific good behavior requirement. Only first-degree murderers and convicts serving rare mandatory minimum sentences saw no benefit.

The public interest is best served by reasonable incentives to encourage acceptable inmate behavior, just as it is served by carefully crafted prison alternatives for nonviolent offenders. Prison officials say they need tools such as “good time” to help them manage their already overcrowded institutions. And they should have them.

But those are rewards that should be earned. The state should set rules that make it perfectly clear which positive acts earn “good time” — and which bad acts will take an inmate’s good time away. Any changes should resurrect those three words that make plain the requirement “for good behavior.”

“Good time” should be a bonus for good behavior in prison, for taking steps toward rehabilitation. On that score, there is an unusual level of agreement among prosecutors, police and advocates for crime victims.

They point to the problems when criminals return home without treating root causes of crime such as mental illness and drug and substance abuse. Taxpayers usually pay more when they offend again.

Ashford says federal court decisions make it difficult, if not impossible, to compel inmates to complete treatment while imprisoned or to participate in prison programs. But lawmakers should look for possible answers. What incentives do other states use?

Legislators already have begun evaluating potential prison alternatives for nonviolent offenders, which could free up cell space for violent, dangerous criminals. It makes sense, also, to include a re-examination of “good time” law in those discussions.

The Jenkins case lends urgency to that effort, because a guy who attacks other inmates, assaults a guard and makes a knife out of a toilet brush surely should have been in custody longer.

The goal should be a fair, predictable process for awarding prisoners “good time” when an inmate’s good behavior earns it — and a fair, predictable, less cumbersome process for forfeiting “good time” when an inmate seriously breaches the rules or the law.

It defies common sense that Jenkins could lose only about 17½ months of “good time” after all he was accused of doing while in prison.

Also, regardless of prison crowding issues, it makes sense that additional crimes committed while in prison should lead to additional time in prison. Sentences for assaulting other inmates or guards should be added onto the end of an inmate’s current sentence.

Finally, lawmakers should look at a “truth-in-sentencing” reform that would spell out for the public how much actual time a prisoner is likely to serve. Because of Nebraska’s current “good time” law, prosecutors often must huddle with a crime victim and his family to explain that the sentence they just heard the judge hand down is not what will be served.

Look at what authorities say Jenkins did in prison: He incited a riot. He tried to escape. He committed at least three assaults, including an attack on a guard. He was caught with a weapon. Yet that cost him only about 15 percent of his automatic “good time.”

That’s a good deal for violent criminals but a bad deal for law-abiding Nebraskans.

Police question suspected burglar; 12-year-old was home alone
Lawyer: Man had right to hand out religious fliers outside Pinnacle Bank Arena
Inmate accused of partially tearing off another's testicles charged with assault
Crew working to disassemble International Nutrition plant
Firefighters put out duplex blaze in N.W. Omaha
Woodmen request would take nearly $40M in valuation from tax rolls
Coffee with a Cop set for Thursday in Benson
In TV ad, Shane Osborn says Ben Sasse 'beholden to Washington'
Douglas County offices accepting credit, debit cards
Teen killed in shooting at Benson's Gallagher Park
Ben Sasse raises more money than U.S. Senate foes Shane Osborn and Sid Dinsdale
Parched Omaha soil soaks up record precipitation
Engineering student harnesses girl power, starts engineering-science club at Gomez Elementary
WB Dodge Street lane closed
Ex-Omaha Mayor Hal Daub endorses Shane Osborn for U.S. Senate seat
New Doane College program promises free tuition for first class
No more last-minute hiring of Omaha Public Schools teachers
Database: How much did Medicare pay your doctor?
New public employee pay data: Douglas, Lancaster, Sarpy Counties, plus utilities
Lunar eclipse was visible in the Omaha area
2 arrested in west Omaha hotel TV thefts
You can tape a cable TV access show at new city-built studio in Omaha
Nancy's Almanac, April 15, 2014: Where did snow, rain fall?
Bellevue man gets 25 years in Mills County sex abuse case
Gov. Heineman, first lady Sally Ganem urge Nebraskans to volunteer
< >
COLUMNISTS »
Breaking Brad: What do the moon, Colorado senators have in common?
How about that "blood red" moon Monday? It was as red as the eyes of a Colorado legislator.
Breaking Brad: Hey, Republicans, are you ready to be audited?
A quick list of audit red flags: 3) You fail to sign your return. 2) You fail to report income. 1) You are a registered Republican.
Breaking Brad: Next year, Bo Pelini brings a mountain lion to the spring game
Before the spring game, Bo Pelini carried a cat onto the field. With Bo's personality, it'd have been more appropriate for him to carry a mountain lion.
Breaking Brad: Bo Pelini's cat lets spring game intro go to its head
Coach Bo Pelini took the field before the spring game holding a cat aloft. Typical cat. He was undoubtedly thinking, “Sixty thousand people, all cheering for me!”
Kelly: 3 former Nebraskans all take seats at the table of international diplomacy
Three former residents of the Cornhusker State are working together at the U.S. Embassy in Paris, and one took part in a recent high-level meeting about Ukraine.
Deadline Deal thumbnail
Schweser's
$25 for a $50 gift card to use at Schweser's!
Buy Now
PHOTO GALLERIES »
< >
SPOTLIGHT »
Omaha World-Herald Contests
Enter for a chance to win great prizes.
OWH Store: Buy photos, books and articles
Buy photos, books and articles
Travel Snaps Photo
Going on Vacation? Take the Omaha World-Herald with you and you could the next Travel Snaps winner.
Click here to donate to Goodfellows
The 2011 Goodfellows fund drive provided holiday meals to nearly 5,000 families and their children, and raised more than $500,000 to help families in crisis year round.
WORLD-HERALD ALERTS »
Want to get World-Herald stories sent directly to your home or work computer? Sign up for Omaha.com's News Alerts and you will receive e-mails with the day's top stories.
Can't find what you need? Click here for site map »